<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bag of Beans &#187; Futurama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/tag/futurama/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org</link>
	<description>Caffeine not included.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did Futurama get the Banach-Tarski Paradox right? [Maths]</title>
		<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/6350</link>
		<comments>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/6350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author-unknown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banach-tarski paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Banach-Tarski Dupla-Shrinker recently made an appearance on an episode of Futurama. Using it, Bender got to make two, slightly smaller, copies of himself. The smaller Benders are why they added the 'shrinker' part of the name. The actual Banach-Tar... <a href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/6350">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>(via <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/io9/vip/~3/omxGy6mV21U/did-futurama-get-the-banach+tarski-paradox-right">io9</a>)</em></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2011/07/duplashrinker.png"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2011/07/500x_duplashrinker.jpg" width="500" alt="Did Futurama get the Banach-Tarski Paradox right?" title="Did Futurama get the Banach-Tarski Paradox right?"></a>The Banach-Tarski Dupla-Shrinker recently made an appearance on an episode of <em>Futurama</em>. Using it, Bender got to make two, slightly smaller, copies of himself. The smaller Benders are why they added the 'shrinker' part of the name. The actual Banach-Tarski theorem allows an object to spawn a perfect copy of itself, at its exact size, just by being chopped into bits. </p>
<p>The paradox was first described in 1924 by Stefan Banach and Alfred Tarski. They showed that, if someone were to chop up a solid ball of any size into six very precisely-shaped pieces, those pieces could be rearranged and used to form two new solid balls, each exactly the same size as the original. The pieces would be re-positioned, but not stretched or blown up to larger proportions. Later, another mathematician reduced the number of pieces necessary to do this to five. It gets even stranger. Another version of the theory has a ball the size of a pea being chopped up and reconstructed to form a ball the size of the sun.</p>
<p>This seems intuitively impossible, but as an added bonus, it's theoretically impossible as well. Physics says that mass cannot be created or destroyed with nothing more than a pair of scissors. Anyone who managed to achieve a practical Banach-Tarski operation would essentially be doubling the mass of something, like magic.</p>
<p>It's not magic that drives this paradox. Rather, it's a certain set of assumptions and some tricks with volume. The theoretical Banach-Tarski ball can be cut into fragments that are infinitely small and thin. These fragments are special shapes for a reason. If we wanted to find the volume of a cube, we could measure one side and cube that measurement. If we encountered a rectangular solid, we could simply multiply the base area times the height. But some shapes don't have such easily defined volumes. The shapes that the ball would have to be cut into would be so jagged and scalloped that they would be more like a scatter of points than a solid. As such, their volume is nebulous enough to double if they're put in the right place. At least theoretically.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Banach-TarskiParadox.html">Wolfram Mathworld</a> and <a href="http://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts/ffiles/30001.1-3-8.shtml">Math Fun Facts</a>.</p><div>
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=omxGy6mV21U:f6lwdPeVh-Q:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/io9/vip/~4/omxGy6mV21U" height="1" width="1">]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/6350/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graphic Novel Friday: The Simpsons &amp; Futurama: Together at Last!</title>
		<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/1862</link>
		<comments>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/1862#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author-unknown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abrams ComicArts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collector's Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Zoidberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Boothby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Lloyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Groening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
As creator Matt Groening mentions in his introduction, fans have been clamoring for a crossover between his two animated series, The Simpsons and Futurama, for years. Yet, The Simpsons characters already exist in the Futurama universe, albeit as a f... <a href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/1862">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>(via <a href="http://www.omnivoracious.com/2010/08/graphic-novel-friday-the-simpsons-futurama-together-at-last.html">Omnivoracious</a>)</em></p>
<div><p>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Simpsons-Futurama-Crossover-Crisis/dp/0810988372"><img align="right" alt="9780810988378" border="0" src="http://nozama.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ed05fc288330134864d32cf970c-250wi" style="margin:0px 0px 5px 5px" title="9780810988378"></a> 
As creator <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Matt-Groening/e/B000AQ3DU8/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1">Matt Groening</a> mentions in his introduction, fans have been clamoring for a crossover between his two animated series, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Simpsons/e/B001CFJ4O0/ref=sr_tc_img_2_0?qid=1282195737&amp;sr=1-2-ent">The Simpsons</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Futurama/e/B001CFZMK0/ref=sr_tc_img_2_0?qid=1282195860&amp;sr=1-2-ent">Futurama</a></em>, for years. Yet, <em>The Simpsons</em> characters already exist in the <em>Futurama</em> universe, albeit as a fictional television show that has been running for over 1,000 years, thus hampering the possibility of characters from both series ever actually meeting. Enter comic books!  I’d be a spoilsport for revealing exactly how it happens within <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Simpsons-Futurama-Crossover-Crisis/dp/0810988372">The Simpsons Futurama Crossover Crisis</a></em>&#39; 208 pages, but its madcap premise is just as head-shakingly weird as any plot in either series. </p>

<p>Eisner-winning writer Ian Boothby has “written more Simpsons Comics than any other writer,” notes his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Boothby">Wikipedia page</a>, and his prowess within the universe certainly shows. Jokes zip through the panels, with plenty of winking at devotees of both shows--fan-favorite cameos abound (<em>Glavin!</em>), as well as appearances by other pop culture properties (there’s an extended Hoth-inspired sequence and run-ins with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias=dvd&amp;field-keywords=dr.+who&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&amp;ih=5_1_1_0_0_0_0_0_0_1.97_108&amp;fsc=-1">Dr. Who</a>, Batman and Superman, and a few of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Stephen-King/e/B000AQ0842/ref=sr_tc_img_2_0?qid=1282196134&amp;sr=1-2-ent">Stephen King</a>’s creations). </p>

<p>
But Boothby wisely keeps the star-studded appearances in check and lets both shows shine. When the <em>Crossover Crisis</em> opens, the Simpsons’ cat, Snowball II, is in a heated electoral debate with Mayor Quimby and appears to be swaying Springfield’s vote. Meanwhile, in the <em>Futurama</em> side of the story, the entire universe is at stake, with vampires, space pirates, and a planet that collects comics all vying for power.  It isn&#39;t long before Bender and Homer discover that they are the best of drinking buddies (Bender to Homer: “You know who’s the greatest guy ever? You!”), while Dr. Zoidberg and Mr. Burns bond at the country club:</p>

<p></p><blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size:12px">Mr. Burns: “How are you enjoying the buffet, Old Man?” </span><span style="font-size:12px"></span></p>

<p><span style="font-size:12px">Zoidberg (covered in food scraps): “This food is mine! Try and take it, and I’ll kill you! I swear I’ll kill all of you!”</span></p>

</blockquote>

<p>
Of course, the mileage of such jokes will vary depending on your familiarity with the shows. And for fans who are used to seeing these characters in animation, artist James Lloyd has faithfully captured the two-dimensional, bug-eyed, and full-of-overbite look inherent to the worlds Matt Groening created. It reads like an adaptation of several episodes, rather than something wholly removed from the small screen. I was sold when a tipsy Bender seduces Flanders&#39; jukebox.</p>

<p>

<a href="http://nozama.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ed05fc28833013486522096970c-popup" style="display:inline"><img align="left" alt="SimpsonsFuturama_3dcover" border="0" src="http://nozama.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ed05fc28833013486522096970c-200wi" style="width:200px" title="SimpsonsFuturama_3dcover"></a> <br> Abrams Comicarts crafted a special die-cut slipcase to house the hardcover, which also includes over two dozen pages of sketches, rejected designs (one image of a <em>Simpsons</em>-ified Conan the Barbarian, complete with a scantily-clad woman wrapped around his ankles, has a note warning, “Watch risqué elements!”), and other odds and ends (now is your chance to see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Alex-Ross/e/B003057R9E/ref=sr_tc_img_2_0?qid=1282196266&amp;sr=1-2-ent">Alex Ross</a>&#39; interpretation of Radioactive Man). A reproduction of the first issue of <em>The Simpsons</em> comics is included in a sleeve near the back--a few gags therein carry over into <em>Crossover</em>, so its inclusion is especially fun. It’s a clever and true-to-its-source celebration of all things <em>The Simpsons</em> and <em>Futurama</em>, belonging on the same shelves that house fans’ DVD collections; a seamless bridge between both worlds--long overdue but well worth the wait. </p>

<p><em>--Alex<br></em></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/1862/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bender&#8217;s Delivery Service: If Hayao Miyazaki reimagined Futurama [Miyazaki]</title>
		<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/989</link>
		<comments>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/989#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author-unknown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hayao miyazaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miyazaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the animated show Futurama came from the brilliant brain of anime director Hayao Miyazaki? It might look a little something like this. We love an earthy Bender! But is his "body matching his brain?" [Bouletcorp via /Film]
   
 <a href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/989">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>(via <a href="http://io9.com/5581097/benders-delivery-service-if-hayao-miyazaki-reimagined-futurama">io9</a>)</em></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2010/07/futurama.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2010/07/500x_futurama.jpg" width="500" alt="Bender&#39;s Delivery Service: If Hayao Miyazaki reimagined Futurama"></a>What if the animated show <em>Futurama</em> came from the brilliant brain of anime director Hayao Miyazaki? It might look a little something like this. We love an earthy Bender! But is his "body matching his brain?" [<a href="http://www.bouletcorp.com/blog/index.php?date=20100626">Bouletcorp</a> via <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/07/06/lol-if-miyazaki-directed-futurama/#ixzz0syryAdvw">/Film</a>]</p><div>
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=bFDG9XfUCmA:CMIhEduuNC8:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/989/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hypnotoad Approves This Act of Nerdery</title>
		<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/893</link>
		<comments>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/893#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author-unknown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impressive Acts of Nerdery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerdery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[?Yes, you&#39;re looking at a massive recreation of  31st-century New New York from Futurama, done my Matt De Lanoy. It's actually 5 feet by 7 feet, and this picture doesn't even include the mutant-filled sewers which De Lanoy also included (head he... <a href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/893">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>(via <a href="http://www.toplessrobot.com/2010/07/hypnotoad_approves_this_act_of_nerdery.php">Topless Robot</a>)</em></p>
<span style="display:inline"><table border="0" width="640"><tbody><tr><td><img alt="4730456558_92d8dc4cd2_b.jpg" src="http://www.toplessrobot.com/4730456558_92d8dc4cd2_b.jpg" width="640" height="480"></td></tr></tbody></table>?</span><br>Yes, you&#39;re looking at a massive recreation of  31st-century New New York from <i>Futurama</i>, done my Matt De Lanoy. It's actually 5 feet by 7 feet, and this picture doesn't even include the mutant-filled sewers which De Lanoy also included (head <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2300-17938_105-10003969.html?tag=mncol">here</a> for a full gallery). It apparently took him two years to build. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go cry for a while at how little I've achieved with my life. Thanks to everyone who sent this in. (<i><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20009439-1.html"><em>Via CNet</em></a></i>)]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/893/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futurama leads Comedy Central to its best Thursday night ever [Good News, Everybody]</title>
		<link>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/804</link>
		<comments>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>author-unknown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david x. cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good news, everybody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Groening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comedy Central gambled on bringing back Futurama, and it's already paid off, big time. Thursday was the channel's best night of the year, and its best Thursday evening ever. Futurama got 2.9 million viewers and ruled among key demographics.
   
 <a href="http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/804">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="syndicated-attribution"><em>(via <a href="http://io9.com/5574757/futurama-leads-comedy-central-to-its-best-night-of-the-year">io9</a>)</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2010/06/340x_n9588466619_2689978_7160719.jpg" width="340" alt="Futurama leads Comedy Central to its best Thursday night ever">Comedy Central gambled on bringing back <em>Futurama</em>, and <a href="http://livefeed.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/futurama-returns-with-strong-ratings-.html">it's already paid off, big time</a>. Thursday was the channel's best night of the year, and its best Thursday evening ever. Futurama got 2.9 million viewers and ruled among key demographics.</p><div>
<a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?i=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~ff/io9/vip?a=UOCvJ58EwwA:4c_VHwG8S_0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/io9/vip?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bagofbeans.tsangal.org/archives/804/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

